The reviews
Every recorded reading of this book: 1 review(s), 5 item(s), 2 still open. A review is not a change-control pack. A pack asks should we change this? A review reports here is what I found when I read it, and its items stay visible whether or not anything was done about them.
The first review is dated after the work it describes, and says so. The founder read this book at v0.1.0 and opened brief 40 with the finding that its title did not hold. That reading produced the retitle and a change-control pack, and was never recorded as a review — the estate has had a review register since v0.3.7 and did not use it for the one substantive reading of this book. r001 records it late, because a pack records a decision and a review records what a reader saw, including the parts the decision did not act on.
A review names the version it READ, not the version it produced: r001 is stamped v0.1.0, and the retitle it caused shipped as v0.2.0. The build refuses a review naming a version this book has never been at. The format is reviews/REVIEWS.md; the machine surface is reviews/index.json. To see what a reading actually changed, read it beside the version diff.
A review names the version it READ, not the version it produced: r001 is stamped v0.1.0, and the retitle it caused shipped as v0.2.0. The build refuses a review naming a version this book has never been at. The format is reviews/REVIEWS.md; the machine surface is reviews/index.json. To see what a reading actually changed, read it beside the version diff.
r001 · r001 — the title does not hold, and the reading that says so was not on the record
| # | Finding | State | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | the title names the two rarest things in the book | actioned | retitled to *Creating a Book Using Agentic Workflows* at v0.6.9, book v0.2.0. |
| 2 | the new title is not earned by the body either | open | open. Tracked as `@editor/issues/open/001` and WS-02 on the board. |
| 3 | does the cover name Claude, or agents? | open | open, and blocked on the founder. `@editor/issues/blocked/002`. |
| 4 | the book leans villager, and brief 40 read it as explorer | superseded | superseded by brief 45. Neither reading was right. |
| 5 | the colophon claimed the second book was unwritten | actioned | corrected at v0.6.9, in the same pass as the retitle. |
For an agent
reviews/index.json carries every review with its items and their states: open, actioned, declined, superseded. An open item is a finding nobody has answered, and it is the half worth reading. To record a reading, write rNNN__kebab-slug.md into reviews/ following the micro-format; the build gates it. Never edit a review to match what happened: mark it superseded and leave it.